?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Question for my Flist

Okay someone on a community I am a member of posted a question about a couple who recently lost their daughter over wheather or not this couple should have another child. To clarify they had two children one was 18 when she died and their other child is about 16 maybe 17

This was my answer
I don't think they should have another child to replace Amanda my parents lost a child 18 years ago (my second eldest sister) I was 6 at the time and still am the youngest child that my parents had. Parents shouldn't have another child to replace the one they lost I find it quite distasteful for parents to do that I would of been upset if my parents had done that when my sister died. I think a couple should have a child if they want a child (or another if they already have a child) but they should have a child to replace a child they have lost.
I'm sorry if my comment offends anyone but that's what I think from my own experience.


What do you think? Should parents who lose a child have another child?

Latest Month

September 2016
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com